![]() The defendants were the project architect and engineer, the Vitetta Group ("Vitetta"), the general contractor, Roland Aristone, Inc. Plaintiff Evesham Township Board of Education ("Board") sought damages based on negligence and breach of contract for faulty design and construction of the Frances S. ![]() Prutting & Lombardi, attorneys for respondent Barber Coleman and Invesys Building Systems, join in the brief of respondent/cross-appellant Vitetta Group. Sander & Carson, P.C., attorneys for cross-appellant Daniel S. Swartz, Campbell, LLC, attorneys for cross-appellant Ertle Roofing, join in the brief of respondent/cross-appellant Vitetta Group. Gary Chiumento argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant Vitetta Group (Chiumento, McNally & Shockley, LLC Raymond H. Epstein, Jacqueline Greenberg Vogt, and Michael S. Epstein argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent Evesham Township Board of Education (Greenberg Traurig, LLP, attorneys Mr. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |